Why don't you Zenn investors ask Mr. Kofman CEO of Zenn to ask Dick Weir to publish the measurements SEAL "observed". Doesn't CEO Kofman want transparency?
All results from the testing provided by SEAL are the property of EEStor. Due to our confidentiality agreement all request for information should be directed to EEStor. Thank you.
If the following posted by a blogger who goes by the ID of Prof Neilson over at theestory.ning.com is true, then a person who witnessed the test leaked confidential information to him. I think there should be an investigation.
"ED and k Testing report by an eyewitness - or nayboob parsers, get a life Posted by Prof Neilson on February 12, 2013 at 12:01pm in Scientific Information View Discussions I talked to the witness of the ED and k testing about an hour ago. I have known the witness for 4 years. The samples were connected to the Yokogawa WT3000 listed in the PR and tested by the WT3000 for ED and k.So the PR reporting of measured ED and k is correct.No room for interpretation as to if the test was run. THE ED AND k TESTS WERE RUN. I have a request in for more details on the integration time and repetition rate. This may take a while so don't get antsy. Its only so I can calculate the max error of the test. Everything in the PR was tested and the test was observed by the witness."
In case anyone is wondering who I am - Prof Neilson
I am Paul Neilson and can be reached at PNeilson@NeilsonLabs.com
Dick Weir is well aware of who the witness was.
No test results other than what were in the PR were given to me. Just the fact that the witness was present and watched the tests was given to me for the express purpose of placing in the EEStory.
Good luck with that investigation EElogical - are you short Zenn too?
I am also curious as to what was measured and how.
ReplyDeleteMay I obtain a copy of the EEStor testing report? Please email to whiskeythief at yahoo dot com. Thank's in advance.
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you Zenn investors ask Mr. Kofman CEO of Zenn to ask Dick Weir to publish the measurements SEAL "observed". Doesn't CEO Kofman want transparency?
ReplyDeleteAll results from the testing provided by SEAL are the property of EEStor. Due to our confidentiality agreement all request for information should be directed to EEStor. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteIf the following posted by a blogger who goes by the ID of Prof Neilson over at theestory.ning.com is true, then a person who witnessed the test leaked confidential information to him. I think there should be an investigation.
ReplyDelete"ED and k Testing report by an eyewitness - or nayboob parsers, get a life
Posted by Prof Neilson on February 12, 2013 at 12:01pm in Scientific Information
View Discussions
I talked to the witness of the ED and k testing about an hour ago. I have known the witness for 4 years. The samples were connected to the Yokogawa WT3000 listed in the PR and tested by the WT3000 for ED and k.So the PR reporting of measured ED and k is correct.No room for interpretation as to if the test was run. THE ED AND k TESTS WERE RUN.
I have a request in for more details on the integration time and repetition rate. This may take a while so don't get antsy. Its only so I can calculate the max error of the test. Everything in the PR was tested and the test was observed by the witness."
http://theeestory.ning.com/forum/topics/ed-and-k-testing-report-by-an-eyewitness-or-nayboob-parsers-get-a?xg_source=activity
Hilarious
DeleteIn case anyone is wondering who I am - Prof Neilson
I am Paul Neilson and can be reached at PNeilson@NeilsonLabs.com
Dick Weir is well aware of who the witness was.
No test results other than what were in the PR were given to me. Just the fact that the witness was present and watched the tests was given to me for the express purpose of placing in the EEStory.
Good luck with that investigation EElogical - are you short Zenn too?