SEAL Consultant
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Worley Claims Expo 2013
Congratulations to
Kristi Admire and Howard Porter
Winners of Our Gift Cards at the
2013 Worley Claims Expo!
Kristi Admire and Howard Porter
Winners of Our Gift Cards at the
2013 Worley Claims Expo!
Monday, January 14, 2013
There is quite a bit of literature and objective data available regarding the risk of natural gas transmission pipelines. The regulators have whittled down the essential information to two important parameters for determining risk for natural gas transmission pipelines. Those two items are the pipe diameter and the pressure. Engineers were hired many years ago to devise a simpler means of assessing the relative risk, and the records show that for the most part it was successful. They have actual heat flux figures to draw a line in the sand between high hazard potential or not. There are tables that describe how many seconds one can be exposed before they will receive blisters for a certain heat flux. They define the acceptable heat flux for a structure and then use that objective information along with the density and type of buildings to route the location of the pipeline. These are methods of risk assessment (severity and probability) that are couched in terms of pipelines and population. For example, a school has much greater weight than uninhabited farmland. These figures work well and they help to make risk objective rather than subjective, and based on real data rather than someone’s guess.
For more of the story see Issue 6 of our Newsletter at www.sealcorp.com/pages.php/newsroom
or contact Gary L. Jackson, P.E., CSP, CFEI at 1-800-624-0905 or gjackson@sealcorp.com for further information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)